This morning while checking facebook a classmate from high school began a conversation on Erykah Badu's new video. I might be one of the few people who don't like the video. I am not against the message it is trying to portray, but the way the video was filmed. This got me to thinking (which most things do) about the idea of "shock value."
A lot of time people do things for shock value to get a message across, but a lot of times the message is lost. A couple of weeks ago a lady spoke at my church and gave her testimony which was awesome and she even wrote a book about it...problem was people were shocked that she stayed in a marriage where her husband said he was bisexual and contracted AIDS and she stuck with him through thick and thin. People were fascinated by events in her story, but did people really learn from her faith and what she learned from her experience.
Same thing for the new Erykah Badu video. If Gabby Sidibe from "Precious" had done the same thing in the video would it have been accepted the same way? Will people remember the video for her being able to be free and who she is or will it be remembered for the fact that she got naked and has a nice body? Hearing more commentary on the"Window Seat" video has helped me understand it a little better (was totally lost at first I will admit) what the video was about, but do most people listen or read commentaries on videos?
Just my thoughts. Sometimes I think shock value has no value. People remember the shock, but not the message. That is all.
Just my thoughts. Sometimes I think shock value has no value. People remember the shock, but not the message. That is all.